ROLR vs RSI

High Roller Technologies, Inc. vs Rush Street Interactive, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

ROLR

Gambling
High Roller Technologies, Inc.
Quality
5.6
out of 10
Value Trap
8
SAFE
Price
$5.44
Last close
Models
10/13
Active
VS

RSI

Gambling
Rush Street Interactive, Inc.
Quality
7.6
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$26.37
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType ROLR Fair ValueROLR Upside RSI Fair ValueRSI Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $2.16 -60.4% $7.94 -69.9%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $6.22 -76.4%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $0.88 -83.8% $1.32 -95.3%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for ROLR vs RSI — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

ROLR vs RSI — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

RSI scores higher with a 7.6/10 quality rating vs ROLR's 5.6/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing High Roller Technologies, Inc. (ROLR) and Rush Street Interactive, Inc. (RSI) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

ROLR currently trades at $5.44 with a QOC of 5.6/10, while RSI trades at $26.37 with a QOC of 7.6/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).