RM vs WRLD

Regional Management Corp. vs World Acceptance Corporation — Valuation Comparison 2026

RM

Personal Credit Institutions
Regional Management Corp.
Quality
8.1
out of 10
Value Trap
20
SAFE
Price
$36.76
Last close
Models
7/13
Active
VS

WRLD

Personal Credit Institutions
World Acceptance Corporation
Quality
6.3
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$165.09
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType RM Fair ValueRM Upside WRLD Fair ValueWRLD Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $746.19 +352.0%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $18.19 -88.0%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $8.57 -75.8%
First Chicago Scenario $10.36 -71.8% $204.82 +36.8%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for RM vs WRLD — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

RM vs WRLD — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

RM scores higher with a 8.1/10 quality rating vs WRLD's 6.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Regional Management Corp. (RM) and World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

RM currently trades at $36.76 with a QOC of 8.1/10, while WRLD trades at $165.09 with a QOC of 6.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).