RM vs SEZL

Regional Management Corp. vs Sezzle Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

RM

Credit Services
Regional Management Corp.
Quality
8.1
out of 10
Value Trap
20
SAFE
Price
$36.28
Last close
Models
7/13
Active
VS

SEZL

Credit Services
Sezzle Inc.
Quality
9.7
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$119.00
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType RM Fair ValueRM Upside SEZL Fair ValueSEZL Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $37.95 -68.1%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $34.43 -71.1%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $8.57 -75.8% $26.85 -77.4%
First Chicago Scenario $12.61 -65.2% $71.41 -40.0%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for RM vs SEZL — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

RM vs SEZL — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

SEZL scores higher with a 9.7/10 quality rating vs RM's 8.1/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Regional Management Corp. (RM) and Sezzle Inc. (SEZL) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

RM currently trades at $36.28 with a QOC of 8.1/10, while SEZL trades at $119.00 with a QOC of 9.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).