REFI vs REG

Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Fi vs Regency Centers Corporation — Valuation Comparison 2026

REFI

Real Estate Investment Trusts
Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Fi
Quality
8.7
out of 10
Value Trap
20
SAFE
Price
$11.37
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

REG

Real Estate Investment Trusts
Regency Centers Corporation
Quality
8.9
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$77.35
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType REFI Fair ValueREFI Upside REG Fair ValueREG Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $20.10 +76.7% $44.12 -43.0%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $12.74 +12.0% $32.84 -57.5%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for REFI vs REG — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

REFI vs REG — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

REG scores higher with a 8.9/10 quality rating vs REFI's 8.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Fi (REFI) and Regency Centers Corporation (REG) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

REFI currently trades at $11.37 with a QOC of 8.7/10, while REG trades at $77.35 with a QOC of 8.9/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).