Quick Summary — RCMT scores higher on quality with 8.9/10 vs TRC's 5.5/10. RCMT trades at $22.91 while TRC trades at $19.09. Both analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR data across 13 institutional models.
RCMT scores higher with a 8.9/10 quality rating vs TRC's 5.5/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.
At $22.91, RCMT trades +37.9% below its Bayesian DCF fair value of $31.60, while TRC at $19.09 trades +74.4% above its estimate of $5.15. TRC shows a wider gap between price and intrinsic value.
RCMT earns a Quality of Company score of 8.9/10 compared to TRC's 5.5/10. This is a significant quality gap — the higher-scoring company demonstrates materially stronger fundamentals across profitability, growth consistency, and balance sheet health. The QOC score synthesizes 32 signals spanning profitability margins, revenue growth, free cash flow, capital allocation, and leverage.
Review the value trap analysis for both RCMT and TRC to assess whether apparent undervaluation reflects genuine opportunity or hidden fundamental risk.
Both RCMT and TRC operate in Conglomerates, which has 25 stocks tracked by CirclFi. Same-industry comparisons provide the most direct insight into relative valuation since both companies face similar regulatory environments, market dynamics, and competitive pressures. Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN), and ensemble methods (CUCE).
11 hidden models compare RCMT vs TRC differently — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more. Some may disagree with the 2 you see above.
Bloomberg Terminal: ~$2,000/mo · FactSet: ~$1,000/mo · CirclFi: $0.90/day
See All 13 Models — $0.90/dayWe don’t predict prices. We show you what 13 independent mathematical frameworks say a stock is worth — and let you decide.