RAY vs SKIN

Raytech Holding Limited vs SkinHealth Systems Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

RAY

Household & Personal Products
Raytech Holding Limited
Quality
8.2
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$3.41
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

SKIN

Household & Personal Products
SkinHealth Systems Inc.
Quality
5.4
out of 10
Value Trap
24
SAFE
Price
$0.79
Last close
Models
9/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType RAY Fair ValueRAY Upside SKIN Fair ValueSKIN Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $6.19 +81.5% $2.16 +175.4%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $6.13 +79.7% $2.18 +152.8%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for RAY vs SKIN — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

RAY vs SKIN — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

RAY scores higher with a 8.2/10 quality rating vs SKIN's 5.4/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Raytech Holding Limited (RAY) and SkinHealth Systems Inc. (SKIN) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

RAY currently trades at $3.41 with a QOC of 8.2/10, while SKIN trades at $0.79 with a QOC of 5.4/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).