QTI vs TMDX

QT Imaging Holdings, Inc. vs TransMedics Group, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

QTI

Electromedical & Electrotherapeutic Apparatus
QT Imaging Holdings, Inc.
Quality
4.5
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$5.00
Last close
Models
8/13
Active
VS

TMDX

Electromedical & Electrotherapeutic Apparatus
TransMedics Group, Inc.
Quality
9.7
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$67.20
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType QTI Fair ValueQTI Upside TMDX Fair ValueTMDX Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.93 -81.5% $61.34 -8.7%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $0.20 -96.9% $41.29 -38.6%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for QTI vs TMDX — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

QTI vs TMDX — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

TMDX scores higher with a 9.7/10 quality rating vs QTI's 4.5/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing QT Imaging Holdings, Inc. (QTI) and TransMedics Group, Inc. (TMDX) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

QTI currently trades at $5.00 with a QOC of 4.5/10, while TMDX trades at $67.20 with a QOC of 9.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).