PXS vs SFL

Pyxis Tankers Inc. vs SFL Corporation Ltd — Valuation Comparison 2026

PXS

Deep Sea Foreign Transportation of Freight
Pyxis Tankers Inc.
Quality
6.6
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$4.16
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

SFL

Deep Sea Foreign Transportation of Freight
SFL Corporation Ltd
Quality
6.7
out of 10
Value Trap
20
SAFE
Price
$11.04
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType PXS Fair ValuePXS Upside SFL Fair ValueSFL Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $7.83 +88.2% $25.06 +127.0%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $1.32 -88.6%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $7.82 +67.2% $46.33 +319.7%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for PXS vs SFL — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

PXS vs SFL — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

SFL scores higher with a 6.7/10 quality rating vs PXS's 6.6/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Pyxis Tankers Inc. (PXS) and SFL Corporation Ltd (SFL) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

PXS currently trades at $4.16 with a QOC of 6.6/10, while SFL trades at $11.04 with a QOC of 6.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).