PXED vs UTI

Phoenix Education Partners, Inc vs Universal Technical Institute I — Valuation Comparison 2026

PXED

Education & Training Services
Phoenix Education Partners, Inc
Quality
1.7
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$30.06
Last close
Models
9/13
Active
VS

UTI

Education & Training Services
Universal Technical Institute I
Quality
7.6
out of 10
Value Trap
24
SAFE
Price
$39.03
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType PXED Fair ValuePXED Upside UTI Fair ValueUTI Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $7.96 -73.5% $16.05 -58.9%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $1.56 -96.0%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $21.00 -24.7% $8.53 -78.1%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for PXED vs UTI — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

PXED vs UTI — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

UTI scores higher with a 7.6/10 quality rating vs PXED's 1.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Phoenix Education Partners, Inc (PXED) and Universal Technical Institute I (UTI) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

PXED currently trades at $30.06 with a QOC of 1.7/10, while UTI trades at $39.03 with a QOC of 7.6/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).