PSTL vs REFI

Postal Realty Trust, Inc. vs Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Fi — Valuation Comparison 2026

PSTL

Real Estate Investment Trusts
Postal Realty Trust, Inc.
Quality
7.6
out of 10
Value Trap
24
SAFE
Price
$23.04
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

REFI

Real Estate Investment Trusts
Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Fi
Quality
8.7
out of 10
Value Trap
20
SAFE
Price
$11.37
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType PSTL Fair ValuePSTL Upside REFI Fair ValueREFI Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $4.64 -79.8% $20.10 +76.7%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $12.74 +12.0%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $1.42 -93.9% $13.67 +20.2%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for PSTL vs REFI — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

PSTL vs REFI — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

REFI scores higher with a 8.7/10 quality rating vs PSTL's 7.6/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Postal Realty Trust, Inc. (PSTL) and Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Fi (REFI) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

PSTL currently trades at $23.04 with a QOC of 7.6/10, while REFI trades at $11.37 with a QOC of 8.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).