POOL vs TLIH

Pool Corporation vs Ten-League International Holdin — Valuation Comparison 2026

POOL

Industrial Distribution
Pool Corporation
Quality
9.3
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$184.70
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

TLIH

Industrial Distribution
Ten-League International Holdin
Quality
7.3
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$3.74
Last close
Models
9/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType POOL Fair ValuePOOL Upside TLIH Fair ValueTLIH Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $109.94 -40.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $65.83 -64.4% $8.19 +119.0%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $1.48 -60.6%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for POOL vs TLIH — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

POOL vs TLIH — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

POOL scores higher with a 9.3/10 quality rating vs TLIH's 7.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Pool Corporation (POOL) and Ten-League International Holdin (TLIH) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

POOL currently trades at $184.70 with a QOC of 9.3/10, while TLIH trades at $3.74 with a QOC of 7.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).