PONY vs SAIC

Pony AI Inc. vs Science Applications Internatio — Valuation Comparison 2026

PONY

Information Technology Services
Pony AI Inc.
Quality
6.3
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$9.96
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

SAIC

Information Technology Services
Science Applications Internatio
Quality
9.2
out of 10
Value Trap
5
SAFE
Price
$103.70
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType PONY Fair ValuePONY Upside SAIC Fair ValueSAIC Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $3.25 -67.4% $160.03 +54.3%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $0.86 -91.3% $9.40 -90.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for PONY vs SAIC — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

PONY vs SAIC — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

SAIC scores higher with a 9.2/10 quality rating vs PONY's 6.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Pony AI Inc. (PONY) and Science Applications Internatio (SAIC) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

PONY currently trades at $9.96 with a QOC of 6.3/10, while SAIC trades at $103.70 with a QOC of 9.2/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).