PHIN vs PRTS

PHINIA Inc. vs CarParts.com, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

PHIN

Auto Parts
PHINIA Inc.
Quality
8.9
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$77.42
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

PRTS

Auto Parts
CarParts.com, Inc.
Quality
6.2
out of 10
Value Trap
20
SAFE
Price
$5.81
Last close
Models
8/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType PHIN Fair ValuePHIN Upside PRTS Fair ValuePRTS Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $82.17 +6.1% $18.98 +226.6%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $14.61 -81.1%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $79.51 +2.7% $0.16 -97.4%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for PHIN vs PRTS — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

PHIN vs PRTS — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

PHIN scores higher with a 8.9/10 quality rating vs PRTS's 6.2/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing PHINIA Inc. (PHIN) and CarParts.com, Inc. (PRTS) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

PHIN currently trades at $77.42 with a QOC of 8.9/10, while PRTS trades at $5.81 with a QOC of 6.2/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).