PH vs WTS

Parker-Hannifin Corporation vs Watts Water Technologies, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

PH

Miscellaneous Fabricated Metal Products
Parker-Hannifin Corporation
Quality
10.0
out of 10
Value Trap
11
SAFE
Price
$844.63
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

WTS

Miscellaneous Fabricated Metal Products
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
Quality
10.0
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$308.98
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType PH Fair ValuePH Upside WTS Fair ValueWTS Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $372.05 -56.0% $149.03 -51.8%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $179.46 -78.8% $76.71 -75.2%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for PH vs WTS — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

PH vs WTS — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

WTS scores higher with a 10.0/10 quality rating vs PH's 10.0/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) and Watts Water Technologies, Inc. (WTS) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

PH currently trades at $844.63 with a QOC of 10.0/10, while WTS trades at $308.98 with a QOC of 10.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).