PGNY vs UNH

Progyny, Inc. vs UnitedHealth Group Incorporated — Valuation Comparison 2026

PGNY

Healthcare Plans
Progyny, Inc.
Quality
8.8
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$25.69
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

UNH

Healthcare Plans
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
Quality
7.4
out of 10
Value Trap
24
SAFE
Price
$382.53
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType PGNY Fair ValuePGNY Upside UNH Fair ValueUNH Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $32.54 +26.7% $264.43 -30.9%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $7.96 -69.0% $141.75 -62.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for PGNY vs UNH — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

PGNY vs UNH — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

PGNY scores higher with a 8.8/10 quality rating vs UNH's 7.4/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Progyny, Inc. (PGNY) and UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

PGNY currently trades at $25.69 with a QOC of 8.8/10, while UNH trades at $382.53 with a QOC of 7.4/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).