PFS vs PGC

Provident Financial Services, I vs Peapack-Gladstone Financial Cor — Valuation Comparison 2026

PFS

Banks - Regional
Provident Financial Services, I
Quality
8.6
out of 10
Value Trap
26
LOW
Price
$22.16
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

PGC

Banks - Regional
Peapack-Gladstone Financial Cor
Quality
9.6
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$43.25
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType PFS Fair ValuePFS Upside PGC Fair ValuePGC Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $4.77 -78.5% $23.17 -46.4%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $4.92 -78.2% $25.23 -41.7%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for PFS vs PGC — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

PFS vs PGC — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

PGC scores higher with a 9.6/10 quality rating vs PFS's 8.6/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Provident Financial Services, I (PFS) and Peapack-Gladstone Financial Cor (PGC) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

PFS currently trades at $22.16 with a QOC of 8.6/10, while PGC trades at $43.25 with a QOC of 9.6/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).