PFIS vs PLBC

Peoples Financial Services Corp vs Plumas Bancorp — Valuation Comparison 2026

PFIS

Banks - Regional
Peoples Financial Services Corp
Quality
7.1
out of 10
Value Trap
20
SAFE
Price
$60.03
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

PLBC

Banks - Regional
Plumas Bancorp
Quality
8.8
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$52.58
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType PFIS Fair ValuePFIS Upside PLBC Fair ValuePLBC Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $22.17 -63.1% $22.13 -57.9%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $64.20 +7.0% $45.60 -13.3%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for PFIS vs PLBC — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

PFIS vs PLBC — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

PLBC scores higher with a 8.8/10 quality rating vs PFIS's 7.1/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Peoples Financial Services Corp (PFIS) and Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

PFIS currently trades at $60.03 with a QOC of 7.1/10, while PLBC trades at $52.58 with a QOC of 8.8/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).