PCAR vs PSNY

PACCAR Inc. vs Polestar Automotive Holding UK — Valuation Comparison 2026

PCAR

Motor Vehicles & Passenger Car Bodies
PACCAR Inc.
Quality
8.6
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$110.37
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

PSNY

Motor Vehicles & Passenger Car Bodies
Polestar Automotive Holding UK
Quality
4.5
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$23.08
Last close
Models
7/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType PCAR Fair ValuePCAR Upside PSNY Fair ValuePSNY Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $113.20 +2.6% $6.02 -73.9%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $39.58 -64.1%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $116.51 +5.6% $97.10 +320.7%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for PCAR vs PSNY — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

PCAR vs PSNY — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

PCAR scores higher with a 8.6/10 quality rating vs PSNY's 4.5/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing PACCAR Inc. (PCAR) and Polestar Automotive Holding UK (PSNY) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

PCAR currently trades at $110.37 with a QOC of 8.6/10, while PSNY trades at $23.08 with a QOC of 4.5/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).