PBHC vs PFIS

Pathfinder Bancorp, Inc. vs Peoples Financial Services Corp — Valuation Comparison 2026

PBHC

Banks - Regional
Pathfinder Bancorp, Inc.
Quality
6.4
out of 10
Value Trap
27
LOW
Price
$13.61
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

PFIS

Banks - Regional
Peoples Financial Services Corp
Quality
7.1
out of 10
Value Trap
20
SAFE
Price
$60.03
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType PBHC Fair ValuePBHC Upside PFIS Fair ValuePFIS Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $3.76 -72.4% $22.17 -63.1%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $5.28 -61.2% $64.20 +7.0%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for PBHC vs PFIS — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

PBHC vs PFIS — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

PFIS scores higher with a 7.1/10 quality rating vs PBHC's 6.4/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Pathfinder Bancorp, Inc. (PBHC) and Peoples Financial Services Corp (PFIS) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

PBHC currently trades at $13.61 with a QOC of 6.4/10, while PFIS trades at $60.03 with a QOC of 7.1/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).