PAX vs RILYL

Patria Investments Limited vs BRC Group Holdings, Inc. - Depo — Valuation Comparison 2026

PAX

Investment Advice
Patria Investments Limited
Quality
7.9
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$11.59
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

RILYL

Investment Advice
BRC Group Holdings, Inc. - Depo
Quality
5.3
out of 10
Value Trap
42
WARN
Price
$16.66
Last close
Models
9/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType PAX Fair ValuePAX Upside RILYL Fair ValueRILYL Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $3.90 -66.3%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $3.98 -65.6% $25.49 +81.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $2.12 -81.7% $12.56 -10.4%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for PAX vs RILYL — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

PAX vs RILYL — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

PAX scores higher with a 7.9/10 quality rating vs RILYL's 5.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Patria Investments Limited (PAX) and BRC Group Holdings, Inc. - Depo (RILYL) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

PAX currently trades at $11.59 with a QOC of 7.9/10, while RILYL trades at $16.66 with a QOC of 5.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).