PAR vs VYX

PAR Technology Corporation vs NCR Voyix Corporation — Valuation Comparison 2026

PAR

Calculating & Accounting Machines (No Electronic Computers)
PAR Technology Corporation
Quality
6.1
out of 10
Value Trap
35
LOW
Price
$15.44
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

VYX

Calculating & Accounting Machines (No Electronic Computers)
NCR Voyix Corporation
Quality
4.7
out of 10
Value Trap
45
WARN
Price
$7.19
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType PAR Fair ValuePAR Upside VYX Fair ValueVYX Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.42 -97.2%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $1.67 -88.3% $11.55 +60.7%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $8.77 -43.2% $4.77 -33.6%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for PAR vs VYX — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

PAR vs VYX — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

PAR scores higher with a 6.1/10 quality rating vs VYX's 4.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing PAR Technology Corporation (PAR) and NCR Voyix Corporation (VYX) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

PAR currently trades at $15.44 with a QOC of 6.1/10, while VYX trades at $7.19 with a QOC of 4.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).