PAG vs RUSHA

Penske Automotive Group, Inc. vs Rush Enterprises, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

PAG

Auto & Truck Dealerships
Penske Automotive Group, Inc.
Quality
7.4
out of 10
Value Trap
8
SAFE
Price
$168.17
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

RUSHA

Auto & Truck Dealerships
Rush Enterprises, Inc.
Quality
9.3
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$71.01
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType PAG Fair ValuePAG Upside RUSHA Fair ValueRUSHA Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $188.25 +11.9% $36.44 -48.7%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $24.54 -85.4% $19.31 -72.8%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for PAG vs RUSHA — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

PAG vs RUSHA — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

RUSHA scores higher with a 9.3/10 quality rating vs PAG's 7.4/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Penske Automotive Group, Inc. (PAG) and Rush Enterprises, Inc. (RUSHA) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

PAG currently trades at $168.17 with a QOC of 7.4/10, while RUSHA trades at $71.01 with a QOC of 9.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).