OXSQ vs PCF

Oxford Square Capital Corp. vs High Income Securities Fund — Valuation Comparison 2026

OXSQ

Asset Management
Oxford Square Capital Corp.
Quality
4.3
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$1.33
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

PCF

Asset Management
High Income Securities Fund
Quality
1.7
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$5.59
Last close
Models
9/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType OXSQ Fair ValueOXSQ Upside PCF Fair ValuePCF Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.50 -62.2% $1.48 -73.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $0.98 -48.8%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $9.47 +69.9%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for OXSQ vs PCF — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

OXSQ vs PCF — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

OXSQ scores higher with a 4.3/10 quality rating vs PCF's 1.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Oxford Square Capital Corp. (OXSQ) and High Income Securities Fund (PCF) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

OXSQ currently trades at $1.33 with a QOC of 4.3/10, while PCF trades at $5.59 with a QOC of 1.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).