OTIS vs TRNR

Otis Worldwide Corporation vs Interactive Strength Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

OTIS

Electronic & Other Electrical Equipment (No Computer Equip)
Otis Worldwide Corporation
Quality
7.6
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$70.84
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

TRNR

Electronic & Other Electrical Equipment (No Computer Equip)
Interactive Strength Inc.
Quality
5.6
out of 10
Value Trap
25
LOW
Price
$0.80
Last close
Models
1/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType OTIS Fair ValueOTIS Upside TRNR Fair ValueTRNR Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $33.06 -53.3% $0.32 -60.7%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $18.94 -73.3%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for OTIS vs TRNR — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

OTIS vs TRNR — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

OTIS scores higher with a 7.6/10 quality rating vs TRNR's 5.6/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Otis Worldwide Corporation (OTIS) and Interactive Strength Inc. (TRNR) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

OTIS currently trades at $70.84 with a QOC of 7.6/10, while TRNR trades at $0.80 with a QOC of 5.6/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).