ORGO vs PAHC

Organogenesis Holdings Inc. vs Phibro Animal Health Corporatio — Valuation Comparison 2026

ORGO

Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Organogenesis Holdings Inc.
Quality
7.2
out of 10
Value Trap
16
SAFE
Price
$2.62
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

PAHC

Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Phibro Animal Health Corporatio
Quality
7.7
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$31.83
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType ORGO Fair ValueORGO Upside PAHC Fair ValuePAHC Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.05 -98.3% $0.39 -98.8%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $0.12 -95.2% $8.11 -74.5%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for ORGO vs PAHC — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

ORGO vs PAHC — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

PAHC scores higher with a 7.7/10 quality rating vs ORGO's 7.2/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Organogenesis Holdings Inc. (ORGO) and Phibro Animal Health Corporatio (PAHC) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

ORGO currently trades at $2.62 with a QOC of 7.2/10, while PAHC trades at $31.83 with a QOC of 7.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).