OII vs PUMP

Oceaneering International, Inc. vs ProPetro Holding Corp. — Valuation Comparison 2026

OII

Oil & Gas Field Services, NEC
Oceaneering International, Inc.
Quality
8.1
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$38.23
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

PUMP

Oil & Gas Field Services, NEC
ProPetro Holding Corp.
Quality
6.8
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$15.26
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType OII Fair ValueOII Upside PUMP Fair ValuePUMP Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $28.37 -25.8% $2.43 -84.1%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $11.95 -68.7% $3.93 -74.2%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for OII vs PUMP — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

OII vs PUMP — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

OII scores higher with a 8.1/10 quality rating vs PUMP's 6.8/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Oceaneering International, Inc. (OII) and ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

OII currently trades at $38.23 with a QOC of 8.1/10, while PUMP trades at $15.26 with a QOC of 6.8/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).