NTIC vs XPEL

Northern Technologies Internati vs XPEL, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

NTIC

Coating, Engraving & Allied Services
Northern Technologies Internati
Quality
8.8
out of 10
Value Trap
16
SAFE
Price
$8.00
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

XPEL

Coating, Engraving & Allied Services
XPEL, Inc.
Quality
9.7
out of 10
Value Trap
11
SAFE
Price
$45.72
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType NTIC Fair ValueNTIC Upside XPEL Fair ValueXPEL Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.46 -94.3% $14.45 -68.4%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $0.70 -91.2% $12.76 -72.1%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for NTIC vs XPEL — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

NTIC vs XPEL — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

XPEL scores higher with a 9.7/10 quality rating vs NTIC's 8.8/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Northern Technologies Internati (NTIC) and XPEL, Inc. (XPEL) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

NTIC currently trades at $8.00 with a QOC of 8.8/10, while XPEL trades at $45.72 with a QOC of 9.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).