NTHI vs NVS

NeOnc Technologies Holdings, In vs Novartis AG — Valuation Comparison 2026

NTHI

Pharmaceutical Preparations
NeOnc Technologies Holdings, In
Quality
3.7
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$4.64
Last close
Models
8/13
Active
VS

NVS

Pharmaceutical Preparations
Novartis AG
Quality
2.4
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$150.17
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType NTHI Fair ValueNTHI Upside NVS Fair ValueNVS Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.78 -83.2% $37.90 -74.8%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $96.94 -34.7%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $2.71 -50.2% $210.80 +39.6%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for NTHI vs NVS — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

NTHI vs NVS — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

NTHI scores higher with a 3.7/10 quality rating vs NVS's 2.4/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing NeOnc Technologies Holdings, In (NTHI) and Novartis AG (NVS) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

NTHI currently trades at $4.64 with a QOC of 3.7/10, while NVS trades at $150.17 with a QOC of 2.4/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).