NRGV vs POLA

Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. vs Polar Power, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

NRGV

Miscellaneous Electrical Machinery, Equipment & Supplies
Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.
Quality
4.7
out of 10
Value Trap
30
LOW
Price
$5.05
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

POLA

Miscellaneous Electrical Machinery, Equipment & Supplies
Polar Power, Inc.
Quality
4.5
out of 10
Value Trap
44
WARN
Price
$2.06
Last close
Models
9/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType NRGV Fair ValueNRGV Upside POLA Fair ValuePOLA Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $1.14 -77.4% $0.07 -96.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $0.24 -94.4%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $0.16 -97.4% $1.28 -30.6%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for NRGV vs POLA — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

NRGV vs POLA — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

NRGV scores higher with a 4.7/10 quality rating vs POLA's 4.5/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. (NRGV) and Polar Power, Inc. (POLA) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

NRGV currently trades at $5.05 with a QOC of 4.7/10, while POLA trades at $2.06 with a QOC of 4.5/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).