NP vs WDH

Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. vs Waterdrop Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

NP

Insurance Agents, Brokers & Service
Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc.
Quality
6.6
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$28.07
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

WDH

Insurance Agents, Brokers & Service
Waterdrop Inc.
Quality
8.8
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$1.53
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType NP Fair ValueNP Upside WDH Fair ValueWDH Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $1.83 -93.5% $1.74 +13.4%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $0.43 -98.5% $1.62 +6.0%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for NP vs WDH — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

NP vs WDH — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

WDH scores higher with a 8.8/10 quality rating vs NP's 6.6/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. (NP) and Waterdrop Inc. (WDH) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

NP currently trades at $28.07 with a QOC of 6.6/10, while WDH trades at $1.53 with a QOC of 8.8/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).