NOAH vs PAX

Noah Holdings Limited vs Patria Investments Limited — Valuation Comparison 2026

NOAH

Investment Advice
Noah Holdings Limited
Quality
8.2
out of 10
Value Trap
29
LOW
Price
$10.57
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

PAX

Investment Advice
Patria Investments Limited
Quality
7.9
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$11.59
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType NOAH Fair ValueNOAH Upside PAX Fair ValuePAX Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $24.45 +131.3% $3.90 -66.3%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $22.47 +112.6% $3.98 -65.6%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for NOAH vs PAX — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

NOAH vs PAX — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

NOAH scores higher with a 8.2/10 quality rating vs PAX's 7.9/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Noah Holdings Limited (NOAH) and Patria Investments Limited (PAX) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

NOAH currently trades at $10.57 with a QOC of 8.2/10, while PAX trades at $11.59 with a QOC of 7.9/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).