NNY vs NOAH

Nuveen New York Municipal Value vs Noah Holdings Limited — Valuation Comparison 2026

NNY

Asset Management
Nuveen New York Municipal Value
Quality
1.7
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$8.54
Last close
Models
8/13
Active
VS

NOAH

Asset Management
Noah Holdings Limited
Quality
8.2
out of 10
Value Trap
27
LOW
Price
$10.38
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType NNY Fair ValueNNY Upside NOAH Fair ValueNOAH Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $2.26 -73.5% $24.67 +137.7%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $22.47 +116.4%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $3.08 -64.0%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for NNY vs NOAH — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

NNY vs NOAH — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

NOAH scores higher with a 8.2/10 quality rating vs NNY's 1.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Nuveen New York Municipal Value (NNY) and Noah Holdings Limited (NOAH) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

NNY currently trades at $8.54 with a QOC of 1.7/10, while NOAH trades at $10.38 with a QOC of 8.2/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).