NHI vs NHPAP

National Health Investors, Inc. vs National Healthcare Properties, — Valuation Comparison 2026

NHI

Real Estate Investment Trusts
National Health Investors, Inc.
Quality
7.4
out of 10
Value Trap
14
SAFE
Price
$73.29
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

NHPAP

Real Estate Investment Trusts
National Healthcare Properties,
Quality
6.2
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$22.35
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType NHI Fair ValueNHI Upside NHPAP Fair ValueNHPAP Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $20.79 -71.6% $12.38 -41.8%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $18.27 -75.1% $23.70 +6.1%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for NHI vs NHPAP — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

NHI vs NHPAP — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

NHI scores higher with a 7.4/10 quality rating vs NHPAP's 6.2/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing National Health Investors, Inc. (NHI) and National Healthcare Properties, (NHPAP) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

NHI currently trades at $73.29 with a QOC of 7.4/10, while NHPAP trades at $22.35 with a QOC of 6.2/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).