NEO vs OPK

NeoGenomics, Inc. vs Opko Health, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

NEO

Diagnostics & Research
NeoGenomics, Inc.
Quality
6.8
out of 10
Value Trap
25
LOW
Price
$10.19
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

OPK

Diagnostics & Research
Opko Health, Inc.
Quality
5.9
out of 10
Value Trap
32
LOW
Price
$1.43
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType NEO Fair ValueNEO Upside OPK Fair ValueOPK Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.46 -95.5% $0.26 -81.8%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $5.57 -41.0% $0.04 -96.8%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for NEO vs OPK — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

NEO vs OPK — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

NEO scores higher with a 6.8/10 quality rating vs OPK's 5.9/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing NeoGenomics, Inc. (NEO) and Opko Health, Inc. (OPK) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

NEO currently trades at $10.19 with a QOC of 6.8/10, while OPK trades at $1.43 with a QOC of 5.9/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).