NBIX vs OTLK

Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. vs Outlook Therapeutics, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

NBIX

Biological Products, (No Diagnostic Substances)
Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
Quality
10.0
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$158.30
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

OTLK

Biological Products, (No Diagnostic Substances)
Outlook Therapeutics, Inc.
Quality
3.7
out of 10
Value Trap
30
LOW
Price
$0.73
Last close
Models
9/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType NBIX Fair ValueNBIX Upside OTLK Fair ValueOTLK Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $121.09 -23.5% $0.07 -90.7%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $34.99 -77.9% $0.17 -35.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for NBIX vs OTLK — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

NBIX vs OTLK — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

NBIX scores higher with a 10.0/10 quality rating vs OTLK's 3.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. (NBIX) and Outlook Therapeutics, Inc. (OTLK) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

NBIX currently trades at $158.30 with a QOC of 10.0/10, while OTLK trades at $0.73 with a QOC of 3.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).