NBIX vs NMRA

Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. vs Neumora Therapeutics, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

NBIX

Biological Products, (No Diagnostic Substances)
Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
Quality
10.0
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$158.30
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

NMRA

Biological Products, (No Diagnostic Substances)
Neumora Therapeutics, Inc.
Quality
3.8
out of 10
Value Trap
30
LOW
Price
$1.85
Last close
Models
7/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType NBIX Fair ValueNBIX Upside NMRA Fair ValueNMRA Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $121.09 -23.5% $0.78 -57.9%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $34.99 -77.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $19.55 -87.7% $1.55 -16.1%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for NBIX vs NMRA — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

NBIX vs NMRA — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

NBIX scores higher with a 10.0/10 quality rating vs NMRA's 3.8/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. (NBIX) and Neumora Therapeutics, Inc. (NMRA) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

NBIX currently trades at $158.30 with a QOC of 10.0/10, while NMRA trades at $1.85 with a QOC of 3.8/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).