MYND vs TACT

Mynd.ai, Inc. vs TransAct Technologies Incorpora — Valuation Comparison 2026

MYND

Computer Peripheral Equipment, NEC
Mynd.ai, Inc.
Quality
4.7
out of 10
Value Trap
57
WARN
Price
$0.61
Last close
Models
7/13
Active
VS

TACT

Computer Peripheral Equipment, NEC
TransAct Technologies Incorpora
Quality
7.9
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$4.47
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType MYND Fair ValueMYND Upside TACT Fair ValueTACT Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $15.22 +240.4%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $0.38 +11.1% $1.73 -61.2%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $1.62 +165.0% $4.37 -2.2%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for MYND vs TACT — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

MYND vs TACT — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

TACT scores higher with a 7.9/10 quality rating vs MYND's 4.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Mynd.ai, Inc. (MYND) and TransAct Technologies Incorpora (TACT) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

MYND currently trades at $0.61 with a QOC of 4.7/10, while TACT trades at $4.47 with a QOC of 7.9/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).