Is MUX or NAMM more undervalued in 2026?

CirclFi compares McEwen Inc. (MUX) and Namib Minerals (NAMM) using 13 institutional-grade valuation models. MUX has a Quality of Company score of 7.1/10 while NAMM scores 6.1/10.

Which is a better buy — MUX or NAMM?

Compare intrinsic values from 13 independent models against current market prices. CirclFi also calculates Value Trap scores. This is not financial advice — conduct your own analysis.

How do MUX and NAMM valuations compare?

MUX at $21.89 and NAMM at $1.52 are compared across Bayesian DCF, EPV, EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, and 8 additional models.

MUX vs NAMM Valuation Comparison 2026 — Intrinsic Value Analysis

MUX

Gold and Silver Ores

McEwen Inc.

Quality

7.1

out of 10

Value Trap

WARN

Price

$21.89

Last close

Models

12/13

Active

NAMM

Gold and Silver Ores

Namib Minerals

Quality

6.1

out of 10

Value Trap

—

Price

$1.52

Last close

Models

10/13

Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

Model	Type	MUX Fair Value	MUX Upside	NAMM Fair Value	NAMM Upside
Bayesian DCF	Intrinsic	$1.13	-94.8%	$0.22	-85.7%
Earnings Power Value	Intrinsic	$3.28	-85.0%	—	—
EROIC Spread	Intrinsic	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
First Chicago	Scenario	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
Markov DDM	Intrinsic	—	—	$1.45	-4.8%
ML-RIV	Intrinsic	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
Dynamic NAV	Asset-Based	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
PWERM	Option-Based	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional	Relative	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
Sentiment SOTP	Hybrid	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
CUCE Ensemble	Ensemble	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
FTNN Topology	Relative	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
RCMH-DCF	Intrinsic	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%

🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for MUX vs NAMM — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

MUX vs NAMM — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

MUX scores higher with a 7.1/10 quality rating vs NAMM's 6.1/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing McEwen Inc. (MUX) and Namib Minerals (NAMM) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

MUX currently trades at $21.89 with a QOC of 7.1/10, while NAMM trades at $1.52 with a QOC of 6.1/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).