MSW vs MYRG

Ming Shing Group Holdings Limit vs MYR Group, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

MSW

Engineering & Construction
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limit
Quality
2.6
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$1.43
Last close
Models
9/13
Active
VS

MYRG

Engineering & Construction
MYR Group, Inc.
Quality
7.2
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$478.93
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType MSW Fair ValueMSW Upside MYRG Fair ValueMYRG Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.38 -73.6% $43.31 -91.0%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $104.55 -78.2%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $2.09 +62.0% $513.20 +7.2%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for MSW vs MYRG — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

MSW vs MYRG — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

MYRG scores higher with a 7.2/10 quality rating vs MSW's 2.6/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Ming Shing Group Holdings Limit (MSW) and MYR Group, Inc. (MYRG) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

MSW currently trades at $1.43 with a QOC of 2.6/10, while MYRG trades at $478.93 with a QOC of 7.2/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).