MSGS vs NIPG

Madison Square Garden Sports Co vs NIP Group Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

MSGS

Entertainment
Madison Square Garden Sports Co
Quality
5.7
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$369.96
Last close
Models
10/13
Active
VS

NIPG

Entertainment
NIP Group Inc.
Quality
2.0
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$0.42
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType MSGS Fair ValueMSGS Upside NIPG Fair ValueNIPG Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $5.64 -98.5% $0.11 -73.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $84.06 -74.8% $1.34 +85.6%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for MSGS vs NIPG — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

MSGS vs NIPG — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

MSGS scores higher with a 5.7/10 quality rating vs NIPG's 2.0/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Madison Square Garden Sports Co (MSGS) and NIP Group Inc. (NIPG) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

MSGS currently trades at $369.96 with a QOC of 5.7/10, while NIPG trades at $0.42 with a QOC of 2.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).