MPT vs NHPAP

Medical Properties Trust, Inc. vs National Healthcare Properties, — Valuation Comparison 2026

MPT

Real Estate Investment Trusts
Medical Properties Trust, Inc.
Quality
6.0
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$5.11
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

NHPAP

Real Estate Investment Trusts
National Healthcare Properties,
Quality
6.2
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$22.35
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType MPT Fair ValueMPT Upside NHPAP Fair ValueNHPAP Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $3.08 -39.4% $12.38 -41.8%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $23.70 +6.1%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $4.04 -21.0% $94.83 +324.3%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for MPT vs NHPAP — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

MPT vs NHPAP — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

NHPAP scores higher with a 6.2/10 quality rating vs MPT's 6.0/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Medical Properties Trust, Inc. (MPT) and National Healthcare Properties, (NHPAP) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

MPT currently trades at $5.11 with a QOC of 6.0/10, while NHPAP trades at $22.35 with a QOC of 6.2/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).