MPAA vs SRI

Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. vs Stoneridge, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

MPAA

Motor Vehicle Parts & Accessories
Motorcar Parts of America, Inc.
Quality
8.2
out of 10
Value Trap
16
SAFE
Price
$11.06
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

SRI

Motor Vehicle Parts & Accessories
Stoneridge, Inc.
Quality
6.7
out of 10
Value Trap
24
SAFE
Price
$7.47
Last close
Models
10/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType MPAA Fair ValueMPAA Upside SRI Fair ValueSRI Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $6.12 -44.7% $1.73 -76.8%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $26.35 +138.2% $0.65 -91.3%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for MPAA vs SRI — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

MPAA vs SRI — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

MPAA scores higher with a 8.2/10 quality rating vs SRI's 6.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. (MPAA) and Stoneridge, Inc. (SRI) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

MPAA currently trades at $11.06 with a QOC of 8.2/10, while SRI trades at $7.47 with a QOC of 6.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).