MMI vs NMRK

Marcus & Millichap, Inc. vs Newmark Group, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

MMI

Real Estate Agents & Managers (For Others)
Marcus & Millichap, Inc.
Quality
6.9
out of 10
Value Trap
26
LOW
Price
$28.24
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

NMRK

Real Estate Agents & Managers (For Others)
Newmark Group, Inc.
Quality
7.7
out of 10
Value Trap
34
LOW
Price
$13.97
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType MMI Fair ValueMMI Upside NMRK Fair ValueNMRK Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $21.34 -24.4% $19.04 +36.3%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $22.93 -17.2% $7.97 -42.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for MMI vs NMRK — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

MMI vs NMRK — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

NMRK scores higher with a 7.7/10 quality rating vs MMI's 6.9/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Marcus & Millichap, Inc. (MMI) and Newmark Group, Inc. (NMRK) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

MMI currently trades at $28.24 with a QOC of 6.9/10, while NMRK trades at $13.97 with a QOC of 7.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).