MITT vs NHP

TPG Mortgage Investment Trust, vs National Healthcare Properties, — Valuation Comparison 2026

MITT

Real Estate Investment Trusts
TPG Mortgage Investment Trust,
Quality
8.0
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$7.72
Last close
Models
10/13
Active
VS

NHP

Real Estate Investment Trusts
National Healthcare Properties,
Quality
6.4
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$14.45
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType MITT Fair ValueMITT Upside NHP Fair ValueNHP Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.17 -97.8% $1.59 -89.0%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $3.28 -58.0% $7.37 -49.0%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for MITT vs NHP — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

MITT vs NHP — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

MITT scores higher with a 8.0/10 quality rating vs NHP's 6.4/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing TPG Mortgage Investment Trust, (MITT) and National Healthcare Properties, (NHP) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

MITT currently trades at $7.72 with a QOC of 8.0/10, while NHP trades at $14.45 with a QOC of 6.4/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).