MGRD vs NOAH

Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. vs Noah Holdings Limited — Valuation Comparison 2026

MGRD

Investment Advice
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
Quality
7.9
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$15.07
Last close
Models
3/13
Active
VS

NOAH

Investment Advice
Noah Holdings Limited
Quality
8.2
out of 10
Value Trap
29
LOW
Price
$10.57
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType MGRD Fair ValueMGRD Upside NOAH Fair ValueNOAH Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $24.45 +131.3%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $22.47 +112.6%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $86.70 +475.3% $20.72 +96.0%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $0.42 -97.2%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for MGRD vs NOAH — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

MGRD vs NOAH — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

NOAH scores higher with a 8.2/10 quality rating vs MGRD's 7.9/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. (MGRD) and Noah Holdings Limited (NOAH) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

MGRD currently trades at $15.07 with a QOC of 7.9/10, while NOAH trades at $10.57 with a QOC of 8.2/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).