MGM vs MLCO

MGM Resorts International vs Melco Resorts & Entertainment L — Valuation Comparison 2026

MGM

Hotels & Motels
MGM Resorts International
Quality
5.8
out of 10
Value Trap
45
WARN
Price
$43.67
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

MLCO

Hotels & Motels
Melco Resorts & Entertainment L
Quality
2.3
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$5.56
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType MGM Fair ValueMGM Upside MLCO Fair ValueMLCO Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $78.52 +103.9% $1.16 -79.0%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $50.58 +31.4% $7.41 +35.7%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for MGM vs MLCO — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

MGM vs MLCO — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

MGM scores higher with a 5.8/10 quality rating vs MLCO's 2.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing MGM Resorts International (MGM) and Melco Resorts & Entertainment L (MLCO) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

MGM currently trades at $43.67 with a QOC of 5.8/10, while MLCO trades at $5.56 with a QOC of 2.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).