MDLZ vs TR

Mondelez International, Inc. vs Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

MDLZ

Confectioners
Mondelez International, Inc.
Quality
7.9
out of 10
Value Trap
8
SAFE
Price
$62.39
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

TR

Confectioners
Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc.
Quality
9.3
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$37.86
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType MDLZ Fair ValueMDLZ Upside TR Fair ValueTR Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $19.96 -68.0% $12.45 -67.1%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $9.38 -85.0% $10.91 -71.2%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for MDLZ vs TR — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

MDLZ vs TR — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

TR scores higher with a 9.3/10 quality rating vs MDLZ's 7.9/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) and Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. (TR) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

MDLZ currently trades at $62.39 with a QOC of 7.9/10, while TR trades at $37.86 with a QOC of 9.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).