MBWM vs MCB

Mercantile Bank Corporation vs Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. — Valuation Comparison 2026

MBWM

Banks - Regional
Mercantile Bank Corporation
Quality
6.2
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$52.83
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

MCB

Banks - Regional
Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp.
Quality
8.5
out of 10
Value Trap
20
SAFE
Price
$89.99
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType MBWM Fair ValueMBWM Upside MCB Fair ValueMCB Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $25.98 -50.8% $75.58 -16.0%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $41.51 -21.4% $102.66 +14.1%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for MBWM vs MCB — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

MBWM vs MCB — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

MCB scores higher with a 8.5/10 quality rating vs MBWM's 6.2/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) and Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. (MCB) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

MBWM currently trades at $52.83 with a QOC of 6.2/10, while MCB trades at $89.99 with a QOC of 8.5/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).