MATH vs MIAX

Metalpha Technology Holding Lim vs Miami International Holdings, I — Valuation Comparison 2026

MATH

Capital Markets
Metalpha Technology Holding Lim
Quality
1.9
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$1.05
Last close
Models
10/13
Active
VS

MIAX

Capital Markets
Miami International Holdings, I
Quality
6.3
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$47.76
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType MATH Fair ValueMATH Upside MIAX Fair ValueMIAX Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.28 -73.5% $18.99 -60.2%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $17.74 -62.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $0.12 -86.4% $12.93 -72.9%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for MATH vs MIAX — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

MATH vs MIAX — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

MIAX scores higher with a 6.3/10 quality rating vs MATH's 1.9/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Metalpha Technology Holding Lim (MATH) and Miami International Holdings, I (MIAX) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

MATH currently trades at $1.05 with a QOC of 1.9/10, while MIAX trades at $47.76 with a QOC of 6.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).