MARPS vs SJT

Marine Petroleum Trust vs San Juan Basin Royalty Trust — Valuation Comparison 2026

MARPS

Oil Royalty Traders
Marine Petroleum Trust
Quality
2.1
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$4.85
Last close
Models
8/13
Active
VS

SJT

Oil Royalty Traders
San Juan Basin Royalty Trust
Quality
1.7
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$3.86
Last close
Models
6/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType MARPS Fair ValueMARPS Upside SJT Fair ValueSJT Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $1.30 -73.3% $1.12 -71.1%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $4.24 -12.6% $3.93 +1.9%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for MARPS vs SJT — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

MARPS vs SJT — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

MARPS scores higher with a 2.1/10 quality rating vs SJT's 1.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Marine Petroleum Trust (MARPS) and San Juan Basin Royalty Trust (SJT) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

MARPS currently trades at $4.85 with a QOC of 2.1/10, while SJT trades at $3.86 with a QOC of 1.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).